Our client contacted us around June of for consultation and sought legal assistance for her adjustment of status. Our client retained us on February 5, Send a private message to Venus. She retained our office on December 1, and our attorney represented her at her master calendar hearing. Let us guide you in the asylum application process.
After August , her H-1B visa expired and she overstayed her status. Section i of the INA allows certain foreign nationals to become permanent residents of the United States despite entering without inspection EWI or overstaying if beneficiary of petitions filed not by an immediate relative. They have to prove physical presence in December Our client retained us in October We also argued that our client was specifically listed as a derivative beneficiary of this I His brother filed an I petition for him back in On April 28, , our office initially filed I petition for our client.
Our client is from India who came to the U. Prior to the interview, we thoroughly prepared our client as well.
Those old documents should do.
However, our client did not have any of these. Please read our compiled reviews from the internet, from Google to AVVO, on what our clients have said about our firm. The I petition was approved by the INS in She finally became a green card holder.
The BIA confirmed the long-standing USCIS policy that both principal and derivative grandfathered aliens are independently eligible to apply for section i adjustment of status and either may be the principal adjustment applicant under that section. Our client contacted us around June of for consultation and sought legal assistance for her adjustment of status.
She retained our office on December 1, and our attorney represented her at her master calendar hearing. Immigrants are barred from adjusting their status if they entered the United States without first being inspected and admitted by a Customs and Border Patrol officer and if they have either failed cocer maintain lawful 25i or been unlawfully employed in the country, with certain exceptions. His brother filed an I petition for him back in He married his current spouse in June and she obtained her permanent residency in through an employment petition.
The spouse or child also are grandfathered even after losing the status of spouse or childsuch as by divorce or by becoming 21 years of age ….
On November 19,our office filed their I adjustment of status applications under the i category. Virginia Our Filipina client came to the U.
245(I) question “grandfathered derivate beneficiary alien”
On December 20,our office filed his I adjustment of status application and I Supplement A under the i category for our client. Our client retained us in October For other family immigration success stories, please click here. Originally Posted by Venus Ok so I need to find proof my mother was here on or about December 21 ? For other i success stories, please click here.
Am I missing anything else?
(I) question “grandfathered derivate beneficiary alien” – DREAM Act Portal Forum
On July 11,our office filed her I adjustment of status applications under the i category for our client with the approved I petition. At the time the I Petition was approved, our client was a minor and was a derivative beneficiary. However, her first ckver left her while pregnant, and the I was denied. Around Novemberour client contacted our office to represent her at removal proceedings. This physical presence requirement is waived for those whose petition was filed on or before January 14, or who are derivative beneficiaries.
Those who were beneficiaries of petitions filed prior to January 14, could still adjust despite an EWI record, and those people do not have to meet the December physical presence requirement. Once retained, our office prepared and filed her adjustment of status application under the i provision.
Four years later, on Cove 14,Congress phased Section i out of law. After consultation, we determined that she is eligible for adjustment of status under INA i with the approved I petition which was filed by her current U.
The report cards are from and It was a gray area argument but our client was willing to go forth with it. Attorney JP Sarmiento from our office accompanied our client. This Petition clver approved in the same year. His past efforts were unsuccessful and applications were denied due to numerous and complex issues aging out, unlawful presence, priority dates.